Ever since the abacus first clashed with the calculator, the epic battle between analog and digital has raged on with hardcore fanatics from both camps ready to tell anyone who is listening exactly why the other side is wrong. From cds to midi controllers, there is an entire universe of digital djing out there, but today we are going to specifically look at DVS (Digital Vinyl System) vinyl time code as compared to its traditional analog record counterpart, and the benefits and disadvantages of time code djing. Whether or not you have had experience with traditional vinyl, or not, the primary reason for investing in a DVS is to get that traditional vinyl feel. So is it the same? Is it superior? There are a few criteria that come to mind:

Functionality

Picture
How different is using time code vinyl compared to traditional vinyl? Not much really. Once you connect the usb interface to your mixer and turntables it’s all essentially the same. The time code sits on the platter. The needle goes in the groove. You can operate the gain, eq, and all the faders on the mixer the same. Monitoring the audio signal is the same, as well as back cueing, adjusting the pitch slider, and beat matching your next track can all be done in the traditional way, as well as being controlled by the software, if you choose.

One of the biggest functional advantages of software djing is portability. Being able to carry every record, you own in a laptop slung over your shoulder in a small bag with two time code records, and a few small pieces of equipment. But what does it take to get them in there?

Nowadays there are a number of websites dedicated to selling high quality downloadable tracks, specifically for use by djs, and of course ripping a cd to a computer is child’s play, but getting those 12” promos archived, yet still retaining their fidelity is a little trickier. The soundcard/interfaces required for all DVS’s include built in preamps, and some of the software have a recording function, so the process is fairly easy, it is the result of the process that leaves much to be desired. Because it is a digital reproduction of the sound, it will never retain the quality of the traditional analog record. Which brings me to my next point…

Sound Quality

Picture
The true test of sound quality is in the variation of the tempo/pitch of the audio. Now with traditional vinyl you can speed it up, slow it down, wind it down, break it, scratch it fast, scratch it slow, and will always retain that warm rich analog sound with no degradation of the sound. Because digital files are a non-continuous recreation of sound, the more you manipulate the sound, the more obvious the flaws are. Think of a picture on a TV, the image you see is not a complete image, it is made up of hundreds of individual pixels, that all do their little part to form an image. Digital audio files act in the same way; they
are a series of sound pixels, if you will that each represent a micro-portion of sound. So what that means is the more you reduce the tempo/pitch of an audio file, the more detached the pixels become from one another, the more prominent the individual pixels become, creating a lo-fi granulated sound. Because of this, breaking, slow scratching, drastically, and sometimes even gradually lowering the tempo/pitch, will never compare to traditional analog vinyl.

Now operating at faster speeds is a little different. Because the speed of the audio file is forcing the pixels closer together, as opposed to spreading them out, the sound will maintain its integrity, to a point. Scratching and play through at 0 to +10% tempo/pitch, with a DVS, is virtually identical audibly to its traditional counterpart; (depending on the quality of the audio file being used) it’s when we raise the tempo/pitch of the track that we begin to notice its fallibility. I have some audio files ripped from vinyls that begin to fail at less than a 5% raise in the tempo/pitch. The highs start to become strained, and the lows become garbled and muddy sounding. In some cases it starts to sound like a whole other song, and not in a good way. And scratching at an extremely high pitch just doesn’t sound right. It is almost like the faster the track gets, the closer the pixels get, almost to the point where they sound like they are overlapping each other. In this category, analog wins every time.                                                                                                                                                                                            

Versatility

Picture
Ages ago when I first started to play with wax, and the place where you would most likely find me was at the record store spending my last dollars on the latest release from Rawkus Records, I used to dream the improbable dream, of being able to create my own records with the sounds I want on them. Being able to scratch sounds from movies, TV, remarks from a borderline racist neighbour. Well it is all possible now. Using a DAW, or recording straight to the software, bringing your sounds, your remixes, and even your own original music, into the mix is fun, easy, and seamless. And on the subject
of seamless, looping beat matching, instant cueing, bringing up your next track, adding effects, can all be done at the touch of a button. Some hardcore vinyl enthusiasts may say that that is cheating, but the audience doesn’t care how you get the sound out, they only care if it sounds good. And taking the time and labour out of beat matching really frees you up to be more creative with your mixes.

One other thing I really enjoyed about using a DVS, is switching back and forth from time code to traditional vinyl is as easy as flipping the input switch on the mixer.

Art

Picture
Music is art. Turntablism is art. Djing is art. So is digital Djing less than art? Is a book written on a laptop less than a book typed on a typewriter? Is a picture designed on a computer less than a picture drawn with pencil or painted with water colours? I don’t know. It’s my opinion that digital djing is a new art form, using technology to give your listeners an experience that you couldn’t give them the traditional way. Being able to remix spontaneously, layer effects, loop, and re-loop, scratch your own voice, play your own music, instantly mixing on four decks. The possibilities are endless. And if you are doing what
you love to do, if you are creating something totally unique from everyone else, if you are making people happy, if you are making people angry, then that’s art, and nobody can take that away from you.

And The Winner Is…..

You! Why take sides, embrace technology. Meld the old with the new. They both have their pros and cons, so use one to balance out the other. Why limit yourself to one genre, one colour, or one format. Once we abandon our preconceived notions, there is a world of opportunities out there, new buttons to press and different knobs to turn. And when we can finally recognize the other side for the attributes that it brings to the table, the world of Djing will be a better place.


                                                                                                                                                                                                 -  Zeke Zelecta
 


Comments

Ian
06/08/2011 2:30pm

Thanks for this! I'm still trying to learn all the amazing things I can do with my TTM 57SL and regular turntables. There are some seriously great advantages, in terms of punching in loops and cues. Sure do hope to drop by this summer to get some instruction.

Reply
12/04/2012 11:27pm

Especially young people love cds and mp3s simply because they are easy to use and convenient. And Digital media have more storage capacity.

Reply
10/08/2012 6:35am

I think the content covered in the blog is quiet impressive and brilliantly conveyed. Good job and great efforts. Keep it up.

Reply
12/12/2012 4:35am

The reason I prefer vinyl is because most often it receives a more dynamic mastering for rock/pop recordings than the CD.

Reply
01/02/2013 10:58pm

According to me digital media is more better because when it comes to portability, nothing comes close as you can carry your entire music library in the palm of your hand.

Reply
01/08/2013 7:48am

Digital recording is more better, because vinyl record is an analog recording, and CDs and DVDs are digital recordings.

Reply
01/09/2013 12:39am

It was great to know about the difference , I was not aware about it.

Reply
02/04/2013 11:21pm

Are Vinyl Recordings Better than Digital?

Reply

Vinyl record is an analog recording, Waveforms from a vinyl recording are much more accurate.

Reply
02/07/2013 2:57am

I heard the vinyl recordings and i must say for a DJ the remixing of song and the beats are important and in this they play well.

Reply
02/08/2013 2:19am

You provide a great versatility in you music that is very nice.

Reply
02/22/2013 3:46am

It's a fact that digital is capable of reproducing higher frequencies than vinyl.

Reply
04/03/2013 1:34pm

I really liked what I red in this site and the whole work done in here. I fell here by searching on google. Thanks.

Reply
05/20/2013 3:42am

This was such an informative and entertaining post! One particular factor that matters a lot is versatility! If a particular product or service is versatile it can have a lot of impact or a psychological advantage among the users! Thanks for such a post!

Reply

Consider a graphic over a TELLY, the actual graphic the thing is that isn't a whole graphic, the item comprises of a huge selection of person pixels, that each accomplish his or her little portion to create a graphic. Electronic digital audio recordings react in the same manner; they will
tend to be a few noise pixels, in case you may that every signify a new micro-portion associated with noise.

Reply
06/10/2013 5:32am

I found this as an entertaining post. The matter is well explained in this article. The topic covers the entire aspect. This made me capable of recognizing the quality of sound as soon I hear the song. I have suggested my friends to look after this article and this was a worth value for them as they are all music lovers.

Reply



Leave a Reply